The Three Rivers

And “killing time, you know you’re going out. Approaching the autumn / winter, as I write this. The boys are in the woods with their guns drawn from the rear seats of the van and go to work for the sport. The that is killing the sport.

This is what they do in a small town called Natchitoches where I live now and in La Grande, Oregon, where I grew up. This is an event held annually. The local supermarket has large wooden racks to see the photo. You can also buy postcards to add your picture with you and the deer is dead. You do not need walls to show more fair to give support to the trucks on the road.

Now I was raised on deer meat and I like it. It makes sense when you need to feed a family, as my people have done years ago. But the sport? As for football fans?

Sarah Palin likes to hunt wolves, which are creatures who think of sympathy. But research on mass murder and war has found that people who enjoy killing animals do not kill people mind for some time. (True Crime) A smile of someone who talks about sports to kill wolves (Detroit Free Press), which is then transmitted in a political arena to celebrate the possible death of your child should make many of us are concerned. (KNVN 24) If anyone likes to kill animals from the sky and discover the fun and smiles when a child goes to war, then this person or worry about protecting our children in a world where killing is a sport?

Some types of creatures are in Palin hit list for some time. Yet they share more than that, help keep the other safe. So you probably should think about protecting these people, especially taking into account all the other problems they have because they are not directly involved in what is happening. What happened to them could be the proverbial tip of the iceberg of what could happen to us.

We talked about the first fish. Let’s talk about salmon. I do not know about you, but salmon is my favorite fish at any time, anywhere. Born and raised in Oregon, in the land of salmon. I grew up with the salmon fillet and came out with their friends and family to take a few from time to time. So I like them and know them well enough to want to make sure you receive proper treatment. By this I mean that they want their water is clean enough to keep them healthy, and I want them to have a general situation of the race, children make and keep many of us eat.

Sarah Palin has the same opinion as me about the salmon. Oh, he loves to grab and eat, it’s true. Protecting them is an entirely different matter. Palin can look at the door and see the fish dying, even when the lake near his house is given as the fish continue to die. To obtain a commercial interest in Wasilla Palin sacrificed the environment to do so. An example is right in your backyard. Lake Lucille has been declared dead serious irregularities and the truth and has been since 1994, when Palin was mayor of Wasilla. This has been documented by the Department of Environmental Conservation Alaska and still like today. (Talbot)

A Wasilla resident, said, as reported in the Hall. com “, was Sarah’s legacy as mayor was big-box stores and growth control,” said Patty Stoll, a former professor of Wasilla. Stoll, reportedly has worked with Palin’s parents, Chuck and Sally Heath, in the same school. He added: “The truth is that Wasilla is simply ugly, is not a pleasant place to live. It is not intended. And this is a sin.

Sarah misses its nest, and I can not understand why. I like to think that it was simply greed or ambition. “(Talbot)

But it is not the only reason salmon are in mourning and outgoing. If you want to die, it probably would with pride and not in contaminated water. You might think that the vision of a lake trick, and turbot therefore, that clean water some regulation was well received. However, Sarah Palin has done the opposite: he spoke against the Clean Water Act Palin and her audience wants more than food, mineral extraction, without the tapeworm, Alaska salmon now have in abundance. (Summer Johnson) I wonder how many people who eat salmon raised in Alaska worry about how that affects them today. Palin apparently do not care.

If you thought there was only fish to worry about, you need to know about bears. Sarah Palin is against classifying polar bears as threatened species. Palin told the audience that scientists had said that polar bears were in no danger at all. When questioned, the measures of secrecy began immediately, as anyone who asked for the mail, experts had been held at bay with large sums of money requested disclosure. Rick Steiner, a professor at the University of Alaska, was a person who had asked for them and they told me that this request could be expensive, like $ 468,784. After passing through federal records, Steiner discovered that scientists had indeed said that polar bears are an endangered species that deserve protection. (Steiner)

Despite the results of Steiner and knowledge about polar bears, Palin has sued to keep polar bears off the endangered list. Palin reason: she was worried that environmentalists are using the Endangered Species Act to block oil and gas, according to an interview he had earlier this year with Glenn Beck.

Palin also said the polar bear population is growing, but experts say. One of them, Ian Stirling, who is a scientist who has studied polar bears for 37 years, said: “The polar bear populations have increased over the past 37 years, and this is a well known fact,” Stirling has studied bears more polar than anyone. So the problem is a lie, no matter the outcome of polar bears in recent days. This makes some people sad, just thinking about what they are soft and tender, but feel sad for the wolves we talk later? (Stirland) Most people do not feel a sense of wonder and joy when they think wolves. In reality most people are scared, but those are the wolves. And “One thing to keep wolves out of areas where people live and work, especially when you can not eat cattle, but only people, even if they are hungry enough. It s nothing else to do a sport, kill for the sake of it. I mentioned that before, but ensures integration with fish and bears.

Palin has put a bounty on wolves’ heads, to encourage average citizens to carry their weapons and go kill from the air, everywhere. (Benjamin), this generosity was finally stopped by legal action. Palin, however, have the practice to continue, despite the ethical issues. On the Internet there smiling pictures of Palin wolf carcasses as part of his campaign, so the practice continues, of course. Palin says that humans kill wolves helps disperse the population of predators that kill elk and moose, subsistence farmers need to survive in Alaska.

In defense of wolves, is certainly not my friends, there is little scientific support Palin’s position. In fact, in 2007, 172 scientists wrote to Palin with his concern about the lack of real science to support killing the wolf population. (Benjamin) They are concerned about the balance of nature linked to global warming taking place in the wilderness of Alaska. (O’Brien) that Palin did not influence the change. The shooting continues and is applauded as well. In the desert of the gun, this is a place most people can practice safe shooting. So what’s next for the propaganda machine that supports Palin as a candidate who really do not care about the effects of what they do for the rest of the world?

As one thinks about life in any form, including protected animals in the acquisition of material gain tells us something about how an individual can relate to the victims of acts over which they have little control. We learn about how Sarah Palin looks at certain social issues to try to understand how he could respond to the legislation surrounding issues such as domestic violence, sexual and rights of persons with disabilities face it, these are the core of their beliefs about life and how we treat the least among us.